Understanding and addressing Salesforce technical debt
Salesforce technical debt eats development efficiency and makes an org harder to maintain. Recent surveys put a large share of administrators on record naming it the hardest part of their job, with nearly a third reporting high levels of it inside their organizations.
Most of it accumulates from unclear requirements and rushed implementations, which is another way of saying you are booking a cleanup project for later. Salesforce is not special here. The same drag on agility and cost shows up across software generally.
Evidence of high technical debt
From the SF Ben Salesforce Admin Survey 2026:
- 56.3% of respondents cited managing technical debt as the most difficult part of their job.
- 30.7% describe their org's technical debt as 'high' (20.7%) or 'very high' (10%).
- 46.6% report 'moderate' technical debt.
Executive support tends to be thin. Only 19.5% of admins get consistent, strong backing from leadership, which says something about the gap between where the pain is felt and where the priorities get set.
Executive understanding of what unaddressed debt costs is limited too:
- 18.5% of admins believe executives clearly understand the consequences.
- 31.8% report a 'general understanding' without detailed insight.
- 10.9% say executives 'do not understand the risks' at all.
Technical debt generation
New debt keeps arriving because builds keep getting requested without clear or complete requirements. 61.9% of admins are 'always' (17.2%) or 'often' (44.7%) asked to build without them. That is a development process choosing speed over clarity, over and over.
Impact on architect roles
The 2025 10K Salesforce Talent Ecosystem Report ties high technical debt to the rising demand for Technical and Solution Architects. That role saw the highest growth in demand at 27%, which follows from how complex and fragmented orgs get after years of incremental development with no consistent architectural oversight.
"After years of incremental expansion and piecemeal projects, often without technical architectural oversight, many Salesforce orgs have become fragmented, inefficient, and difficult to scale." - 2025 10K Salesforce Talent Ecosystem Report
Global context of technical debt
Broader software industry reports back up the scale of this. CAST's 'Coding in the Red' report (2025) found that 45% of global code is 'fragile', 32% suffers from 'bloat' and 31% is 'too rigid'. Greg Rivera of CAST estimates that even if every developer on the planet worked on nothing but technical debt, clearing it would take nine years. A 2023 STX Next report had over 90% of global CTOs naming technical debt as their primary challenge, often traced back to skills shortages that push teams toward sub-optimal solutions. Deloitte analysis from March 2026 suggests technical debt accounts for 21% to 40% of an organization's IT spending.
Strategies for managing technical debt
Nick Spencer, a Salesforce Application Architect, argues for handling this proactively and continuously:
- Question the 'why' behind every build. Scrutinize the purpose and the necessity.
- Treat debt like an invasive weed that needs constant management. Complete elimination is usually not possible.
- Write user stories with well-defined acceptance criteria so ambiguity does not turn into debt.
- Populate the description fields inside Salesforce consistently. That is your documentation.
- Watch Salesforce system limits, on Apex and object fields for instance, as an indicator of underlying debt.
- Run the Salesforce Health Check page and read the warning signs it surfaces.
- Ask for dedicated time for maintenance and refactoring. Spencer calls this 'good husbandry', and system health depends on it.
Leave a Comment